Protecting Copyrighted Work

More intellectual property and work is copyrighted than you think.  You have likely heard about copyright infringements and violations in the news involving music, pieces of writing or other art.  Sometimes infringements are completely on accident, but that doesn’t mean the owner of the copyrighted work won’t take action.  Learn how copyrighted work is protected in the article from the Reporters Committee below.

How to avoid copyright infringement — Legal action to protect a copyright

How to avoid copyright infringement

Copyright infringement can be embarrassing, costly and criminal. Under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, circumventing copyright protection systems such as signal scramblers or encryption technology is now a criminal offense.

The best way to avoid violating a copyright is simply to obtain the author’s permission before using that expression of ideas or facts. If you cannot get the author’s permission, restate the ideas in your own words.

Avoid using large segments of someone else’s expression verbatim — this could be a blatant copyright infringement. The radio news announcer who broadcasts stories from the local newspaper word for word is asking to be sued.

Not every unauthorized use of a copyrighted work is a copyright infringement. The statute considers some limited uses to be “fair uses,” such as news reporting, commentary, criticism, research, teaching and scholarship. The Supreme Court found in 1994 that the commercial parody of the classic rock and roll song “Oh, Pretty Woman” by the rap group 2 Live Crew may be protected as a fair use under the Copyright Law.15

However, no use is presumptively “fair.” Courts examine four factors in deciding whether a specific use is a “fair use”:

• The purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is commercial or of a non-profit, educational nature.

• The nature of the copyrighted work.Uses of expressive, as opposed to factual, works are less likely to be considered fair uses, as are uses of unpublished works.

• The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole.Here the court will consider the qualitative as well as the quantitative use. If the user excerpts 200 words from a 10,000-word book, but those 200 words constitute the heart of the book, this may not qualify as fair use.

• The effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.If the challenged use adversely affects the potential market for the copyrighted work, the use is not fair.

The Supreme Court in 1988 let stand a ruling that use of unpublished diaries and letters under the premise of research or news reporting may impair the future value of those writings. Such works are protected by a prepublication copyright. Further, there is a presumption that use of unpublished works is not fair use, the lower court concluded.16

Posting an entire document online may not constitute fair use if done for purposes other than comment, criticism or news reporting. In a 1996 decision, a federal district court held that a former church member violated the church’s copyright when he posted documents — which contained church doctrine, normally available only to paying members of the church — wholesale on the Internet with virtually no additional editorial comment. However, the church’s suit against a newspaper that published an article including excerpts of posted materials was dismissed because the newspaper’s reporting was in the public interest and it made selective and limited use of the material.17

In November 2010, The U.S. District Court in New York ordered Gawker Media to remove extensive excerpts (as many as 21 pages by one account) of former U.S. vice presidential candidate and Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s unreleased book from its website. Gawker complied and did not appeal.

Using hyperlinks that direct a user to another’s news article or online posting is generally not considered an infringing use, unless the link was made knowing that the linked-to material was itself infringing and with the intent of inducing people to follow the link and infringe copyright.18


Legal action to protect a copyright

If a copyright has been infringed, the owner may sue the infringer in federal court, seeking an injunction against future violations of the copyrights. The owner may recover actual damages, which are losses plus the infringer’s profits from use of the copyrighted work. Or, any time before a court issues a final judgment, the owner can elect to receive a set amount in damages as defined in the copyright statute, in lieu of actual damages. The amount of statutory damages can range from $200 to $150,000, based on a court’s determination of several factors, including whether the infringement was intentional.


15. Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music Inc., 114 U.S. 1164 (1994).

16. Salinger v. Random House, 484 U.S. 890 (1988).

17. Wright v. Warner Books, Inc., 953 F.2d 731 (2d Cir. 1991).

18. See Ticketmaster Corp. v., Inc., 2000 WL 1887522 (C.D. Ca., March 27, 2000).